Search This Blog

Sunday, April 24, 2022

Help Pull America Back from the Brink of Dictatorship

If you do not want to see America become a dictatorship, I urge you to read and then share Heather Cox Richardson's April 23, 2022 Letters from an American with all of your friends, especially those living in states where Republican legislators are working to pass laws to ensure that only Republicans can win elections. It is also imperative that you urge them to share the letter with all of their friends.

One short excerpt from Richardson's April 23 letter cuts to the chase, summarizes the current situation, and explains why sharing this letter is of critical importance:
Former speechwriter for George W. Bush David Frum wrote in 2018: "If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.” And here we are.

April 23, 2022

Late last night, the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol filed a motion asking a judge to put an end to the attempts of Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows to stonewall the committee. Meadows has tried to avoid talking to the committee or providing it with documents, using a number of different arguments that essentially try to establish that the U.S. president cannot be held accountable by Congress. The committee’s motion carefully explains why those arguments are wrong.

To support their belief that the Congress has the right and responsibility to investigate the circumstances of the January 6 insurrection—a correct understanding of our governmental system, in my view—the committee gave the judge almost 250 pages of evidence.

Included was some of the material I’ve been waiting for: a list of members of Congress who participated in planning to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

We have heard a lot about independent lawyers and members of the executive branch who were willing to try to keep Trump in office. We have also heard about people at the state level. But while there has been plenty of speculation about what members of Congress were involved, we had little to go on.

We knew that both former energy secretary Rick Perry of Texas and Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) had texted with Meadows about possible avenues for overturning the election. We knew that Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and Lauren Boebert (R-CO) had recorded videos before the insurrection that suggested they supported it. We had an odd statement from Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on January 5 saying that he, not then–vice president Mike Pence, would count the certified electoral ballots the next day. We had Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) allegedly saying to Jordan on January 6, “Get away from me. You f**ing did this.”

But the January 6th committee has just given us a bigger—although not the whole, yet—picture.

In last night’s filed motion was part of the testimony to the committee from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former special assistant to the president and the chief of staff. When asked which members of Congress were involved in calls about overturning the election—including calls saying such efforts were illegal—Hutchinson named Representatives Greene, Jordan, Boebert, Scott Perry (R-PA), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Mo Brooks (R-AL), Jody Hice (R-GA), Paul Gosar (R-AZ), and Debbie Lesko (R-AZ).

The heart of this group was the “Freedom Caucus,” which was organized in 2015 to move the Republican Party farther to the right. Its first chair was Jim Jordan; its second was Mark Meadows. Its third was Andy Biggs. Mick Mulvaney, who would go on to Trump’s White House, and Ron DeSantis, who is now governor of Florida, were key organizers.

Let’s be clear: the people working to keep Trump in office by overturning the will of the people were trying to destroy our democracy. Not one of them, or any of those who plotted with them, called out the illegal attempt to destroy our government.

To what end did they seek to overthrow our democracy?

The current Republican Party has two wings: one eager to get rid of any regulation of business, and one that wants to get rid of the civil rights protections that the Supreme Court and Congress began to put into place in the 1950s. Business regulation is actually quite popular in the U.S., so to build a political following, in the 1980s, leaders of the anti-regulation wing of the Republican Party promised racists and the religious right that they would stomp out the civil rights legislation that since the 1950s has tried to make all Americans equal before the law.

But even this marriage has not been enough to win elections, since most Americans like business regulation and the protection of things like the right to use birth control. So, to put its vision into place, the Republican Party has now abandoned democracy. Its leaders have concluded that any Democratic victory is illegitimate, even if voters have clearly chosen a Democrat, as they did with Biden in 2020, by more than 7 million votes.

Former speechwriter for George W. Bush David Frum wrote in 2018: "If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.” And here we are.

As if to illustrate this point, news broke today that a North Carolina official threatened to fire an elections official unless she gave him access to the county’s vote tabulators. The news agency Reuters noted that this threat was only one of more than 900 instances of intimidation of election officials in what has become commonplace after the 2020 election.

It appears that elected officials of the Republican Party are willing to overturn a legitimate Democratic victory in order to guarantee that only a Republican can hold office. That means a one-party state, which will be overseen by a single, powerful individual. And the last 59 days in Ukraine have illustrated exactly what that kind of a system means.

Standing against that authoritarianism, Democratic president Joe Biden is trying to reassure Americans that democracy works. He insisted on using the government to support ordinary Americans rather than the wealthy, and in his first year in office, poverty in the United States declined, with lower-income Americans gaining more than at any time since the “War on Poverty” in the 1960s. Lower-income workers have more job opportunities than they have had for 30 years, and they are making more money. They have on average 50% more money in the bank than they did when the pandemic hit.

Biden’s insistence on investing in Americans meant that by the end of his first year, the U.S. had created 6.6 million jobs, the strongest record of any president since record keeping began in 1939. By the beginning of April, the economy had added 7.9 million jobs, and unemployment was close to a 50-year low at 3.6%. Meanwhile, the deficit is dropping: we should carve $1.3 trillion off it this year.

Biden’s deliberate reshaping of the American government to work for ordinary Americans again, regulating business and using the federal government to enforce equal rights, so threatens modern Republicans that they are willing to destroy our country rather than allow voters to keep people like Biden in power.

I do not believe that a majority of Americans want a dictatorship in which a favored few become billionaires while the rest of us live without the civil rights that have been our norm since the 1950s, and no voting rights to enable us to change our lot.

Tonight, news broke that Democrats in Utah have voted to back Independent candidate Evan McMullin for senator rather than run their own candidate. McMullin is trying to unseat Republican Senator Mike Lee, whose texts to Meadows as they conspired to overturn the election have lately drawn headlines. Democrats are gambling that there are enough Democrats, Independents, and anti-Trump Republicans in Utah to send Lee packing. 

Sunday, April 17, 2022

Blather, Rinse, Repeat

The Republican Script That's Destroying The Country
  1. Create a problem.
  2. Blame the problem on Democrats without any evidence to back up your accusation.
  3. Call any evidence that refutes the accusation Fake News.
  4. Create another problem.

link to source

But wait! There's one more, critical component…

5. Count on the brainwashed base to use the following rationale to support your bullshit and flush truth and the country down the toilet. 

link to source

A Republican with clear vision reacts to the script...

link to source

Monday, March 28, 2022

Victims and Oppressors


The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
But in ourselves, that we are underlings.
– William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar



People who support Donald Trump truly believe they are victims, and in a sense they are. However, the source of their victimhood is a carefully crafted and nurtured fabrication unrelated to reality.

Since childhood they have been brainwashed so effectively that they dare not question the authority of their religious and political "leaders" and blindly blame whichever other du jour they're told is oppressing them. The others they blame are always demonized with a political trope that reduces a person, an idea, or an entire group of people to a name or phrase designed to elicit a dog whistle response rooted in prejudice and bigotry.

Here, in no particular order, are a few examples of such tropes:
socialism
Nancy Pelosi
right to life
Hillary
right to work
critical race theory
illegal immigrants
cancel culture 

Brainwash check:
As you read through the list, what emotions did you feel? How much factual information do you really have about each of the items listed?

Did you feel suspicion of or even outright hatred for Nancy Pelosi, socialism, or Hillary? Are you uncomfortable when you hear the terms cancel culture and illegal immigrants? If so, you are a victim of right-wing brainwashing.

For further reading:
The link below will take you to an article that unmasks the lies behind the cancel culture trope in particular, and by extension, other such political canards.


Sunday, February 27, 2022

No Pain; No Education

An old adage says, "No pain; no gain." Learning, however, requires pain. It only happens when students feel the pain that comes from recognizing their ignorance and overcome it by gaining new knowledge and insights.

Across America, Republican lawmakers are working undermine the educational process by making sure there is no pain for them and their supporters and absolutely no gain for anyone else.

Lawmakers want to ban discomfort in school. But Black history isn't always comfortable

Updated February 24, 202212:37 PM ET 

Heard on  All Things Considered

ANYA STEINBERG

Link to article


Learning about Black history isn't always comfortable, neither is learning about The Holocaust or any other topic these self-serving lawmakers wish to exclude from American education by banning this list of 
"uncomfortable" books that would expose their hypocrisy and duplicity.

Thursday, April 15, 2021

Lemon Pledge

The content of this seventeen-year-old article is every bit as relevant to the problems we face today as it was when it was written, and for the same reasons.

Publication: The Columbus Dispatch;Date: Mar 1, 2004;Section: Forum;Page: 7

Reciting Pledge of Allegiance problematic in a modern light


    Let's talk about the Pledge of Allegiance. How much do you really know about it? I dare say few of us left school without being introduced to the national anthem's Francis Scott Key. Yet most of us recited the pledge at the start of every school day without knowing much about its provenance.
    This year, in a case that has generated more raw emotion than a Jimmy Swaggart repentance, the u.S. Supreme Court will determine whether the pledge is constitutionally viable. Michael Newdow, a father, lawyer and atheist, challenged the recitation of the pledge in his young daughter's public-school classroom.
    Newdow objects to the words under God, claiming, logically, that the phrase is an expression of religious conviction – a belief in a deity – and therefore violates the separation of church and state. Amazingly, a federal appellate court agreed: and the government's appeal is set for argument before the Supreme Court on March 24.
    There is no getting around the historical fact that the phrase under God was intended as an overt statement of religious belief. It was inserted by Congress in 1954, 62 years after the pledge was written, purposely to proclaim the United States as a believer nation, in sharp contrast to the official atheism of the Soviet Union.
    An intellectually honest court would say that professing a belief in a deity as part of a daily ritual in our public schools violates the Bill of Rights. However, if the high court required the words under God to be excised, the resulting political uproar would lead to the passage of a pledge-protection constitutional amendment faster than you could say Tom DeLay.
    Either way, this is not going to end well for liberty.
    So, here's my modest proposal: Stop directing schoolchildren to say the pledge or any rote recitation of national fealty, not because of the roiling under-God debate, but because loyalty oaths are a backward approach to generating allegiance and are beneath us as a nation.
    Instead we should be imbuing young people with a thoroughgoing understanding of our founders' vision, and investing in civics classes that teach the meaning of liberty and justice for all and how this country, sometimes fitfully, expanded individual rights and the franchise to all its citizens.
    That is how you inspire loyalty. Daily oaths and pledges of allegiance are for nations that don't have as much to be proud of as ours. We have freedom: we don't need a pledge.
    There is another reason why we should retire the pledge: Francis Bellamy, its author. Bellamy penned the simple prose in 1892 as part of a quadricentennial celebration of Columbus Day. But there are many aspects of Bellamy's thinking that would be uncomfortable to 21st century Americans.
    He was an avowed socialist, whose thoughts were very much in line with his more famous cousin, Edward Bellamy, the author of Looking Backward, 2000-1887. Published in 1888, the novel describes the United States in the year 2000 as a nation transformed into a command economy, in which every adult is enlisted in the nation's industrial army. There is no private enterprise. Goods are obtained through the government with the use of ration cards. And everyone is granted the same annual"income." In the Bellamys' view, this socialist vista was utopia.
    Francis Bellamy's pledge also prescribed a "military salute" to accompany its recital. Originally, there was no hand upon one's heart; rather, the flag salute resembled that adopted by the nazis: right hand straight out, level with the forehead, palm down. As the words were said, the palm was to be turned up toward the flag.
    Old pictures of students striking this pose don't generate the warmth typically associated with seeing young people express their love of country; instead they are chilling reminders of the danger of blind loyalty.
    Bellamy's pledge may have sounded like an ode to equal justice, but he was a bigot himself. As editor of the magazine, The Illustrated American, he wrote editorials denouncing southern European immigrants: "A democracy like ours cannot afford to throw itself open to the world," he wrote in 1897. "Where every man is a lawmaker, every dull-witted or fanatical immigrant admitted to our citizenship is a bane to the commonwealth. Where all classes of society merge insensibly into one another every alien immigrant of inferior race may bring corruption to the stock."
    This is the man to whom American schoolchildren essentially pay homage every morning by reciting his words.
    Ending the pledge is obviously a nonstarter in a country that busts a gasket when even a small adjustment, such as returning the pledge to its original text, is suggested. Apparently, you are not a patriot unless you believe that government employees should lead schoolchildren every morning to profess a belief in God and declare how this nation loves liberty. Who says this country suffers from a dearth of irony?

    Robyn Blumner writes for Tribune Media Services.

Tuesday, March 23, 2021

The Real Danger Is...

 

...Ron Johnson and those who follow him.

Despite the batty image in the editorial cartoon below, Ron Johnson is not crazy. Johnson is a racist demagogue who knows exactly what he's doing. The dangerous game he's playing is designed to reassure the bigots in his right-wing base that he's with them and working to undermine the rights of those he and they hate.



link to source

Thursday, March 18, 2021

Kvetch As Kvetch Can

 

As Democrats work to govern, Republicans kvetch.



Other than cutting taxes for the richest among us, Republicans offer no - as in ZERO - policy proposals for solving the problems facing our country. In fact, they deny the very existence of real problems and instead spout debunked conspiracies to distract the public from their self-serving agenda.

A Letter Perfect Solution

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Adding a single, short line to the first letter of Mr. Carlson's first name to chang...